Section Overview
Section Number
173
Section Title
Punishment for Bribery
Act
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)
Status
Active
Applicability
Applicable throughout India wherever the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is in force.
BNS Section 173 provides punishment for the offence of bribery relating to elections. The provision is intended to preserve the purity of the electoral process by prohibiting the giving or accepting of any gratification for influencing voting behaviour or electoral rights. It complements the provisions defining bribery under BNS Section 170 and ensures that those engaging in corrupt electoral practices are held criminally liable.
The section reflects the constitutional principle that elections must be conducted freely, fairly, and without unlawful influence. By criminalizing electoral bribery, the law seeks to maintain public confidence in democratic institutions.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English / Hinglish)
BNS Section 173 batata hai ki agar koi election ke dauran vote lene, vote dene, ya kisi candidate ko support ya oppose karne ke badle paisa, gift, ya koi aur benefit deta ya leta hai, to us vyakti ko saza di ja sakti hai.
Simple words mein:
-
Vote kharidna illegal hai.
-
Vote bechna bhi illegal hai.
-
Kisi voter ko paise ya gift dekar influence karna offence hai.
-
Election ko fair banaye rakhne ke liye bribery ko punish kiya jata hai.
Is section ka purpose free and fair elections ko protect karna hai.
Legal Definition (Original Law Text)
BNS Section 173 substantially provides that any person who commits the offence of bribery shall be punished with imprisonment, fine, or both, as prescribed under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Practical Interpretation
The section applies whenever illegal gratification is connected with the exercise of an electoral right.
Examples include:
-
Offering cash to vote for a candidate.
-
Giving gifts to influence voters.
-
Accepting money in exchange for voting.
-
Promising employment or other benefits for electoral support.
The offence is complete even if the bribery attempt does not actually change the election result.
The provision discourages corruption and protects the independence of voters.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
A person guilty of bribery under BNS Section 173 may be punished with:
-
Imprisonment as provided under the section.
-
Fine.
-
Or both imprisonment and fine.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
Generally Bailable (subject to procedural law).
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
Generally Non-Cognizable unless otherwise provided.
Compoundable
Not Compoundable.
Triable By
Judicial Magistrate of the First Class or other competent criminal court.
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
Section 171E of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
BNS Equivalent
Section 173 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
Status
Replaced with substantially similar provisions.
Comparison Between IPC and BNS
The legal principle remains largely unchanged.
Both provisions:
-
Punish electoral bribery.
-
Protect electoral integrity.
-
Discourage corruption in elections.
-
Ensure equal voting rights.
The BNS modernizes the language while preserving the core objective of the IPC.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1
A candidate distributes ₹1,000 to villagers in exchange for votes.
This amounts to bribery and is punishable under BNS Section 173.
Example 2
A voter accepts a mobile phone from a political worker in return for voting for a specific candidate.
The voter and the person offering the benefit may both attract legal consequences.
Example 3
A political supporter promises free household appliances to individual voters if they cast votes for a particular party.
Such conduct may amount to electoral bribery under this section.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name
Jamuna Prasad Mukhariya v. Lachhi Ram
Court
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway
The Supreme Court upheld laws regulating corrupt electoral practices and emphasized that restrictions on electoral bribery are consistent with constitutional principles.
Case Name
N.P. Ponnuswami v. Returning Officer
Court
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway
The Court highlighted the importance of maintaining the purity of elections through legal safeguards.
Case Name
Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India
Court
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway
The Court reiterated that democratic elections require transparency, fairness, and freedom from corrupt practices.
Legal Insights
When is this Section Applied?
This provision is commonly invoked where:
-
Money is offered for votes.
-
Gifts are distributed to influence voters.
-
Electoral rights are bought or sold.
-
Illegal inducements affect election campaigns.
Common Misuse Scenarios
Festival Gifts Before Elections
Candidates may disguise bribes as gifts during election campaigns.
Cash Distribution
Direct payment to voters shortly before polling.
False Allegations
Political rivals may falsely accuse opponents of bribery without evidence.
Indirect Benefits
Promises of employment, contracts, or financial assistance linked to voting.
Defenses Available
Common legal defenses include:
-
No gratification was offered.
-
No connection existed between the benefit and electoral rights.
-
False implication due to political rivalry.
-
Lack of evidence.
-
Benefit provided for a lawful purpose unrelated to elections.