Section Overview
Section Number: 304
Section Title: Snatching
Act: Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS)
Status: Active
Applicability: Applicable across India under BNS framework
Original Legal Text
(1) Theft is snatching if, in order to commit theft, the offender suddenly or quickly or forcibly seizes or secures or grabs or takes away from any person or from his possession any movable property.
(2) Whoever commits snatching, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Purpose of the Section
The main objectives of BNS Section 304 are:
-
Address sudden street-level theft crimes
-
Protect citizens from violent or forceful grabbing
-
Differentiate snatching from simple theft
-
Ensure stricter deterrence for public safety
-
Reduce urban crime incidents like chain snatching
This section focuses on quick, forceful property grabbing in public spaces.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English / Hinglish)
In simple terms, BNS Section 304 means:
If someone suddenly or forcefully grabs your belongings (like mobile, chain, bag) and runs away, it is snatching.
In Hinglish:
“Agar koi vyakti achanak ya zabardasti kisi ki cheez cheen leta hai aur bhaag jata hai, toh usse snatching kehte hain.”
Legal Definition
The essential ingredients of snatching are:
-
Property must be movable
-
Taken suddenly, quickly, or forcibly
-
From a person’s possession
-
Without consent
-
Intention to commit theft
Unlike theft, snatching involves direct physical interaction or forceful grabbing.
Practical Interpretation
Courts treat snatching as a serious street crime because it involves:
-
Immediate fear or harm to victim
-
Public disturbance
-
Sudden deprivation of property
Common examples include:
-
Mobile snatching from hand
-
Chain snatching on roads
-
Bag snatching in crowded places
-
Wallet grabbing in buses or markets
Key factors considered:
-
Speed of act (suddenness)
-
Force used
-
Public setting
-
Fear or injury caused
Even minimal force is enough to qualify as snatching.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
-
Imprisonment up to 3 years, and
-
Fine
Legal Classification Table
| Particular | Details |
|---|---|
| Punishment | Up to 3 years imprisonment + fine |
| Bailable | Generally bailable (depends on case facts) |
| Cognizable | Cognizable |
| Compoundable | Non-compoundable |
| Triable by | Magistrate |
IPC ↔️ BNS Mapping
| IPC Section | BNS Section | Status |
|---|---|---|
| IPC did not have separate “snatching” section (covered under theft/robbery interpretation) | BNS Section 304 | Newly defined/clarified |
BNS 304 introduces clear statutory recognition of snatching as a distinct offence from theft and robbery.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Mobile Snatching
A person riding a bike suddenly grabs a mobile phone from someone walking on the road and escapes.
This is snatching under BNS Section 304.
Example 2: Chain Snatching
An offender forcibly pulls a gold chain from a woman’s neck in a crowded market and runs away.
This falls under snatching.
Example 3: Bag Snatching in Bus
A person quickly grabs a passenger’s bag inside a moving bus and exits at the next stop.
This is also snatching.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
State v. Suresh Kumar (Chain Snatching Case Interpretation)
Court:
Delhi High Court
Key Takeaway:
The Court observed:
-
Snatching involves sudden force and immediate removal of property
-
Even minor physical contact is sufficient
-
Public fear and safety impact are key considerations
This principle is reflected in modern codification under BNS Section 304.
Legal Insights
When is this Section Applied?
BNS Section 304 is applied when:
-
Property is taken suddenly or forcefully
-
Victim is directly involved
-
Crime occurs in public or semi-public space
-
Immediate escape follows the act
Common Misuse Scenarios
-
False allegations after minor disputes
-
Misinterpretation of accidental contact
-
Family or personal property conflicts
-
Civil disputes converted into criminal cases
Defenses Available
An accused may defend themselves by showing:
-
No sudden or forceful taking
-
Consent of owner
-
Property was not taken forcibly
-
False implication
-
Lack of intent to steal