Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 115
Section Title:
Abetment of Offence Punishable with Death or Imprisonment for Life if Offence Not Committed
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Replaced under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023
Applicability:
IPC Section 115 applies when:
-
A person abets the commission of an offence.
-
The offence is punishable with death or imprisonment for life.
-
The offence is not actually committed.
-
No specific punishment for such abetment is provided elsewhere in the IPC.
The provision punishes the dangerous conduct of abetment even when the planned offence never takes place.
Original Law Text
"Whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life shall, if that offence be not committed in consequence of the abetment, and no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine;
and if any act for which the abettor is liable in consequence of the abetment, and which causes hurt to any person, be done, he shall be liable either to imprisonment for life, or to such punishment as is hereinbefore provided."
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 115 ka simple matlab hai:
Agar koi vyakti kisi aise crime ko karwane ki koshish karta hai jo death penalty ya life imprisonment se punishable hai, lekin wo crime actually nahi hota, tab bhi us vyakti ko punishment mil sakti hai.
Law ka objective hai ki:
"Serious crimes ki planning aur instigation ko bhi punish kiya jaye, chahe final crime complete na hua ho."
For example:
A, B ko kisi vyakti ka murder karne ke liye instigate karta hai.
B murder karne nahi jata.
Murder nahi hua.
Phir bhi A ko IPC Section 115 ke tahat punishment mil sakti hai.
Legal Definition (Original Law Text)
The section recognizes that:
-
Abetment itself can be dangerous.
-
Liability may arise even without completion of the intended offence.
-
Serious offences deserve preventive punishment.
-
Harm caused during failed attempts may attract enhanced punishment.
Practical Interpretation
Courts generally examine:
-
Whether abetment actually occurred.
-
Whether the intended offence was punishable with death or life imprisonment.
-
Whether the offence was ultimately committed.
-
Whether hurt was caused during the process.
If the offence is not committed, Section 115 applies.
If the offence is committed, other provisions relating to abetment become applicable.
Essential Ingredients of IPC Section 115
Abetment
The accused must have committed abetment under Section 107.
Serious Intended Offence
The offence must be punishable with:
-
Death, or
-
Imprisonment for life.
Offence Not Committed
The principal offence must not actually take place.
No Specific Punishment Elsewhere
The IPC must not provide a separate punishment provision.
Resulting Harm (Optional)
If hurt occurs during the process, enhanced punishment may apply.
Why IPC Section 115 Was Introduced?
The legislature understood that:
-
Planning serious crimes creates social danger.
-
Instigation itself can threaten public safety.
-
Failure of the principal offender should not automatically benefit the abettor.
Without Section 115:
-
Individuals could encourage murders and other grave crimes without facing adequate punishment.
-
Criminal liability would depend entirely on the actions of others.
The section therefore protects society from dangerous criminal encouragement.
Relationship with IPC Sections 107 to 114
Section 107 defines abetment.
Section 108 defines abettor.
Sections 109–114 address different forms of liability.
Section 115 specifically covers situations where:
-
A very serious offence was abetted.
-
The offence was never committed.
Thus, it acts as a special punishment provision.
Difference Between IPC Sections 115 and 116
Section 115
Applies to offences punishable with:
-
Death
-
Imprisonment for life
Section 116
Applies to offences punishable with imprisonment but not death or life imprisonment.
Therefore, Section 115 deals with the most serious categories of crimes.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
Where offence is not committed:
-
Imprisonment up to 7 years.
-
Fine.
Where hurt is caused:
-
Imprisonment for life, or
-
Punishment otherwise provided under the section.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
Generally determined according to the facts and gravity of the case.
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
Usually depends upon procedural classification and circumstances.
Compoundable
Generally non-compoundable because of the serious nature of the intended offence.
Triable By
Typically triable by a Court of Session or another competent criminal court depending on circumstances.
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 115
BNS Equivalent
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues to punish abetment relating to grave offences even when the principal offence is not completed.
Status
IPC repealed and replaced by BNS.
The principle remains substantially preserved.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Planned Murder Not Executed
A pays B to kill C.
B later changes his mind.
No murder occurs.
A may still be punished under Section 115.
Example 2: Terror-Related Conspiracy
A encourages another person to commit an offence punishable with death.
The offender is arrested before carrying out the plan.
The abettor remains liable.
Example 3: Hurt Caused During Failed Plan
A instigates B to commit murder.
B attacks the victim but only causes injuries.
Since hurt occurred, enhanced punishment may apply.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
Jamuna Singh v. State of Bihar
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
The Court discussed essential principles governing abetment and criminal liability.
Case Name:
Chitresh Kumar Chopra v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
The Court emphasized intention, instigation, and the mental element required for abetment.
Case Name:
Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
The Court clarified the evidentiary requirements for proving abetment.
Legal Insights
When Is This Section Applied?
Section 115 is commonly applied when:
-
Murder is planned but not committed.
-
A capital offence is instigated but fails.
-
Serious crimes are encouraged but prevented.
-
Courts must punish dangerous abetment despite failure of the principal offence.
Common Misuse Scenarios
Assuming Completion Is Necessary
Many people wrongly believe punishment requires completion of the offence.
Confusing Preparation with Abetment
Mere thoughts or discussions may not amount to abetment.
Weak Proof of Instigation
The prosecution must prove actual abetment.
Ignoring Mens Rea
Criminal intention remains essential.
Defenses Available
No Abetment
The accused never instigated, aided, or conspired.
Lack of Intention
The required criminal intention is absent.
False Allegations
The accused was wrongly implicated.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecution cannot establish abetment beyond reasonable doubt.