Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 140 – Wearing Garb or Carrying Token Used by Soldier, Sailor or Airman

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 10, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 140

Section Title:

Wearing Garb or Carrying Token Used by Soldier, Sailor or Airman

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Replaced under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Applicability:

IPC Section 140 applies when:

  • A person wears military clothing, uniforms, badges, decorations, insignia, or tokens.

  • The person is not entitled to wear them.

  • The intention is to create a false impression of military status.

The provision protects public trust in the armed forces and prevents impersonation of military personnel.

Original Law Text

"Whoever, not being a soldier, sailor or airman in the Military, Naval or Air Service of the Government of India, wears any garb or carries any token resembling any garb or token used by such a soldier, sailor or airman with the intention that it may be believed, or with the knowledge that it is likely to be believed, that he is such a soldier, sailor or airman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both."

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 140 ka simple matlab hai:

Agar koi aadmi military uniform, badge, medal, rank insignia ya military identity se milta-julta symbol pehenkar logon ko yeh believe karwana chahta hai ki woh Army, Navy ya Air Force ka member hai, to us par IPC Section 140 lag sakta hai.

Simple words mein:

"Military officer ya soldier ban kar jhootha impression create karna crime hai."

Legal Definition

The section punishes a person who:

  • Is not a soldier, sailor, or airman,

  • Wears military garb or carries military tokens,

  • Intends others to believe that he belongs to the armed forces,

  • Or knows that such belief is likely to arise.

The offence focuses on deception and false representation.

Practical Interpretation

Military uniforms represent:

  • Authority,

  • Service,

  • National duty,

  • Public trust.

Unauthorized use may:

  • Mislead citizens,

  • Facilitate fraud,

  • Undermine confidence in institutions.

Therefore, the law restricts misuse of military identity.

Essential Ingredients of IPC Section 140

Person Not Entitled

The accused must not be a genuine military member entitled to wear the uniform or insignia.

Military Garb or Token

The person must wear or carry:

  • Uniforms,

  • Badges,

  • Medals,

  • Rank insignia,

  • Military identification symbols,

  • Similar tokens.

Intention or Knowledge

The accused must:

  • Intend others to believe he is military personnel, or

  • Know that such belief is likely.

Meaning of Garb

Garb refers to:

  • Military uniform,

  • Official attire,

  • Service dress,

  • Combat dress,

  • Ceremonial uniform.

Meaning of Token

Token may include:

  • Medals,

  • Service ribbons,

  • Rank badges,

  • Military insignia,

  • Identification symbols,

  • Decorations.

Why IPC Section 140 Was Introduced?

The legislature introduced this provision to:

  • Protect the reputation of the armed forces.

  • Prevent impersonation.

  • Stop fraudulent misuse of military identity.

  • Safeguard public trust.

Importance of Military Identity

Military personnel often receive:

  • Public respect,

  • Special privileges,

  • Security access,

  • Official recognition.

False claims of military status may be used for unlawful gain.

Fraudulent Purpose

The section primarily targets situations where:

  • Military appearance is used deceptively.

  • Others are intentionally misled.

  • False authority is projected.

Difference Between Costume and Impersonation

Not every use of military clothing is criminal.

For example:

Theatrical Performance

Use in films or stage performances generally lacks criminal intent.

Fancy Dress Events

Costume use without deceptive intent usually does not attract liability.

Fraudulent Representation

Pretending to be military personnel for personal benefit may attract Section 140.

Public Policy Objective

The armed forces enjoy a unique position in society.

The law therefore seeks to prevent unauthorized individuals from exploiting military identity.

Modern Relevance

Today, fake military identities may be used for:

  • Financial fraud,

  • Employment scams,

  • Social influence,

  • Unauthorized access.

The section remains relevant in preventing such misuse.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 140 provides:

  • Imprisonment up to 3 months, or

  • Fine up to ₹500, or

  • Both.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

Bailable.

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

Generally Non-Cognizable.

Compoundable

Generally Non-Compoundable.

Triable By

Any Magistrate.

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 140

BNS Equivalent

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues to recognize offences involving false representation and misuse of military identity.

Status

IPC repealed and replaced by BNS.

The principle remains substantially retained.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Fake Army Officer

A civilian wears an Army officer's uniform and introduces himself as a serving officer to gain influence.

IPC Section 140 may apply.

Example 2: False Military Decoration

A person displays military medals and claims military service despite never serving in the armed forces.

Liability may arise under Section 140.

Example 3: Access Through Impersonation

An individual wears military-style uniform and attempts to enter a restricted area by pretending to be an airman.

Section 140 may be invoked.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name:

State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The Court emphasized the importance of statutory compliance in matters affecting public interests.

Case Name:

Kehar Singh v. State (Delhi Administration)

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The judgment discussed intention and criminal conduct involving deception.

Case Name:

Jamuna Singh v. State of Bihar

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The Court examined principles relating to criminal intention and participation.

Legal Insights

When Is This Section Applied?

Section 140 is applied when:

  • Military uniforms are misused.

  • A person falsely claims military status.

  • Public deception occurs.

  • Authorities discover unauthorized military impersonation.


Common Misuse Scenarios

 Social Media Impersonation

Individuals wear uniforms for false online identities.

 Financial Fraud

Fake military officers seek money or benefits.

Unauthorized Access

Military appearance is used to gain entry into restricted places.

False Prestige

People falsely claim military credentials to gain social advantage.


Defenses Available

No Intention to Deceive

The accused never intended others to believe he was military personnel.

Legitimate Use

The clothing was used for:

  • Acting,

  • Educational purposes,

  • Ceremonial events,

  • Historical exhibitions.

Lack of Resemblance

The attire does not sufficiently resemble military garb.

Absence of Knowledge

The accused did not know that others might be misled.

False Allegation

The accusation lacks evidence.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 140 punishes unauthorized wearing of military uniforms or tokens with intent to create a false impression of military status.

Imprisonment up to three months, fine up to ₹500, or both.

Yes.

Generally, it is non-cognizable.

No. Criminal intention or knowledge must be present.

Yes, where there is no intention to deceive.

Because it may mislead the public and undermine trust in the armed forces.

Badges, medals, insignia, decorations, and similar symbols.

Yes, if they falsely represent themselves as military personnel.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues to address offences involving false representation and misuse of military identity.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation