Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 175 – Omission to Produce Document or Electronic Record to Public Servant by Person Legally Bound to Produce It

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 11, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number

IPC Section 175

Section Title

Omission to Produce Document or Electronic Record to Public Servant by Person Legally Bound to Produce It

Act

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status

Active under IPC framework (conceptually continued under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023)

Applicability

IPC Section 175 applies when a person is legally bound to produce a document or electronic record before a public servant and intentionally fails or refuses to do so.

The provision applies in situations involving:

  • Police investigations

  • Court proceedings

  • Administrative inquiries

  • Government inspections

  • Regulatory proceedings

Original Law Text

“Whoever, being legally bound to produce or deliver up any document or electronic record to any public servant, as such, intentionally omits so to produce or deliver up the same, shall be punished…”

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 175 ka simple matlab hai ki agar law ke hisab se aapko koi document ya electronic record kisi government authority ko dena zaroori hai aur aap jaanbujhkar use nahi dete, to aap offence kar rahe hain.

Simple words mein:

“Lawfully maange gaye documents ko jaanbujhkar na dena crime hai.”

Example:

Agar police investigation ke dauran aapse CCTV footage maangi jaati hai aur aap jaanbujhkar footage chhupa dete hain, to Section 175 lag sakti hai.

Legal Definition (Original Law Text)

“Whoever, being legally bound to produce or deliver up any document or electronic record to any public servant, as such, intentionally omits so to produce or deliver up the same…”

Practical Interpretation

Section 175 ka objective public authorities ko unke legal functions perform karne mein assist karna hai.

Courts, police officers aur government authorities kai baar:

  • Documents

  • Registers

  • Financial records

  • Property papers

  • Digital records

  • Emails

  • Electronic data

ki demand karte hain.

Agar concerned person intentionally cooperate nahi karta, to investigation aur justice process obstruct ho sakta hai.

Isi situation ko address karne ke liye Section 175 banaya gaya hai.

Essential Ingredients of IPC Section 175

Legally Bound Person

Accused legally obligated hona chahiye document produce karne ke liye.

Document or Electronic Record

Physical ya digital record hona chahiye.

Lawful Demand

Demand competent public servant dwara ki gayi honi chahiye.

Intentional Omission

Failure deliberate hona chahiye.

Public Servant

Demand kisi legally authorized public servant ne ki ho.

Why IPC Section 175 Was Introduced?

Lawmakers ne is section ko introduce kiya taaki:

  • Evidence concealment roka ja sake

  • Investigations smooth chal sake

  • Judicial proceedings efficient rahen

  • Administrative transparency maintain ho

  • Public cooperation ensure ho

Importance in Modern Digital Era

Aaj ke samay mein electronic records bahut important evidence hote hain.

Examples:

  • Email communications

  • WhatsApp records

  • CCTV footage

  • Computer logs

  • Online transaction records

Isliye Section 175 ki relevance pehle se zyada badh gayi hai.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

General Cases

  • Simple imprisonment up to 1 month, or

  • Fine up to ₹500, or

  • Both

If Document Is Required Before Court

  • Simple imprisonment up to 6 months, or

  • Fine up to ₹1,000, or

  • Both

Bailable / Non-Bailable

Bailable

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

Non-Cognizable

Compoundable

Generally Non-Compoundable

Triable By

Any Magistrate

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 175

BNS Equivalent

The principle continues under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions dealing with non-compliance with lawful directions and production of records.

Status

Conceptually Retained

The obligation to produce legally required documents remains part of the modern criminal justice framework.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: CCTV Footage Not Produced

A shop owner is legally directed by police to provide CCTV footage related to a robbery.

He intentionally deletes or refuses to provide the footage.

IPC Section 175 may apply.

Example 2: Financial Records Concealed

Tax authorities demand accounting records from a business owner.

The owner deliberately withholds the records.

This may attract liability under Section 175.

Example 3: Refusal to Submit Digital Evidence

A company receives lawful notice requiring production of emails relevant to an investigation.

Management intentionally refuses to provide them.

Section 175 may be invoked.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name

M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra

Court

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway

The Court discussed production and seizure of documents during investigations and emphasized the significance of documentary evidence.

Case Name

State of Gujarat v. Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi

Court

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway

The Court examined obligations relating to documentary evidence and lawful investigative powers.

Case Name

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Singhara Singh

Court

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway

Compliance with lawful procedural requirements is essential for administration of justice.

Legal Insights

When Is This Section Applied?

Section 175 is generally applied when:

  • Documents are withheld from police

  • Court-directed records are not produced

  • Government inquiries are obstructed

  • Digital evidence is concealed

  • Administrative proceedings are delayed through non-cooperation


Common Misuse Scenarios

No Legal Duty Exists

Sometimes authorities demand records that the person is not legally required to produce.

mproper Demand

The public servant may lack legal authority.

Document Not Available

The accused may genuinely not possess the document.

Technical Failure

Electronic records may become inaccessible due to system failure.


Defenses Available

No Legal Obligation

The accused was not legally bound to produce the document.

Lack of Possession

The document was not in the accused's custody or control.

Improper Authority

The person demanding the record lacked legal authority.

Genuine Inability

Loss, destruction, or technical failure prevented production.

Absence of Intent

Failure occurred accidentally and not intentionally.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 175 punishes intentional failure to produce a document or electronic record when legally required by a public servant.

Yes. It is a bailable offence.

No. It is generally non-cognizable.

Punishment can extend up to 6 months imprisonment and/or fine depending on the circumstances.

Yes. The section specifically covers electronic records.

Yes, if there is a legal obligation to provide it.

Generally no. Intentional omission is required.

Responsible individuals within companies may face liability where legal obligations exist.

Genuine inability to produce the document may be a valid defense.

The principle continues under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions relating to compliance with lawful directions and production obligations.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation