Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 250 – Altering Appearance of Coin to Make It of Less Value

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 12, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 250

Section Title:

Altering Appearance of Coin to Make It of Less Value

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Active under IPC framework; corresponding provisions continue under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 relating to currency fraud and economic offences.

Applicability:

IPC Section 250 applies when:

  • A person alters the appearance of an Indian coin;

  • The alteration makes it appear of lower value;

  • The act is done fraudulently or dishonestly;

  • The intention is to deceive or cause wrongful gain/loss.

This section focuses on downward manipulation of coin value.

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 250 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi vyakti kisi Indian coin ko is tarah badalta hai ki woh uski asli value se kam value ka dikhe, to woh crime karta hai.

Simple words mein:

"Coin ko jaanbujhkar uski value kam dikhana crime hai."

Yeh section public ko financial fraud se protect karta hai.

Legal Definition (Original Law Text)

The essence of IPC Section 250 is:

Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly alters the appearance of a coin so as to make it appear of less value than it actually is commits an offence.

Practical Interpretation

To establish liability under Section 250, prosecution must prove:

  1. The object was a coin;

  2. It was an Indian coin;

  3. Its appearance was altered;

  4. The alteration made it appear of lower value;

  5. The act was fraudulent or dishonest.

Intent to deceive is essential.

Why IPC Section 250 Was Introduced?

Lower-value manipulation can lead to:

  • Fraud in trade;

  • Loss to unsuspecting citizens;

  • Circulation of devalued coins;

  • Economic imbalance in small transactions.

Thus, law criminalizes such manipulation.

Importance of Preventing Downward Value Manipulation

Even reducing perceived value can:

  • Affect market trust;

  • Mislead buyers/sellers;

  • Enable fraudulent exchange practices;

  • Distort everyday commerce.

Difference Between Section 248 and 250

Section 248

Altering coin to appear of higher value.

Section 250

Altering coin to appear of lower value.

Thus:

  • Section 248 = inflation of value.

  • Section 250 = deflation of value.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 250 provides:

  • Imprisonment up to 7 years; AND

  • Fine.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

Generally Non-Bailable

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

Cognizable

Compoundable

Non-Compoundable

Triable By

Magistrate of First Class

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 250

BNS Equivalent

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita includes provisions relating to:

  • Currency fraud;

  • Alteration of monetary instruments;

  • Economic deception offences.

Status

IPC repealed and replaced by BNS, but principle remains preserved.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Coin Scraping

A person scratches coins to make them appear older and less valuable.

Section 250 applies.

Example 2: Chemical Damage

An accused uses chemicals to damage coin appearance so it looks devalued.

This attracts liability.

Example 3: Fraud in Exchange

A person alters coins to mislead sellers into accepting lower value.

Section 250 becomes applicable.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name:

Mobarik Ali Ahmed v. State of Bombay

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Fraudulent intent is essential in economic offences involving deception.

Case Name:

State of Maharashtra v. Mayer Hans George

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Economic offences impacting public trust require strict enforcement.

Case Name:

R.K. Dalmia v. Delhi Administration

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Manipulation of financial instruments is treated seriously under law.

Legal Insights

When Is This Section Applied?

Section 250 is applied when:

  • Coins are deliberately devalued in appearance;

  • Fraudulent intent is proven;

  • Deceptive economic practices are detected;

  • Currency manipulation affects transactions.


Common Misuse Scenarios

 Natural Wear and Tear

Normal aging of coins is not an offence.

Accidental Damage

Unintentional scratches or damage are excluded.

 Lack of Intent

No fraudulent purpose exists.

Misinterpretation of Condition

A naturally worn coin may be wrongly assumed altered.


Defenses Available

No Fraudulent Intent

No intention to deceive.

Natural Usage

Changes occurred through normal circulation.

No Alteration

No deliberate modification made.

False Allegation

Accused wrongly implicated.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 250 punishes altering coins to make them appear of lower value.

Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine.

Generally no. It is a serious offence.

Yes. It is cognizable.

No. Intentional alteration is required.

Section 248 increases perceived value; Section 250 decreases perceived value.

No, natural wear is not an offence.

BNS includes similar provisions on currency manipulation and fraud.

It prevents deceptive reduction of coin value and protects trade fairness.

Yes. Fraudulent or dishonest intent is essential.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation