Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 351
Section Title:
Assault
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, with substantially similar principles retained.
Applicability:
IPC Section 351 applies whenever:
-
A person makes a gesture or preparation;
-
Another person reasonably believes criminal force is about to be used;
-
The conduct creates immediate apprehension of harm.
The section serves as the foundational definition for assault-related offences throughout criminal law.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 351 batata hai ki assault kab hota hai.
Simple words mein:
Agar koi vyakti aisa gesture, action ya preparation karta hai jisse dusre vyakti ko lage ki uspar abhi force ya attack hone wala hai, to assault ho sakta hai.
👉 Actual maarna zaroori nahi hai.
Sirf aisa dar paida karna ki force use hone wali hai, assault ho sakta hai.
Legal Definition
A person commits assault when:
-
He makes a gesture or preparation;
-
He intends or knows that such conduct will cause apprehension;
-
Another person reasonably believes criminal force is about to be used.
Essential Ingredients of Assault
Gesture or Preparation
There must be:
-
A threatening gesture,
-
A threatening movement,
-
Preparation indicating imminent force.
Apprehension of Criminal Force
The victim must reasonably believe:
Criminal force is about to be used.
Intention or Knowledge
The accused must:
-
Intend to create apprehension; OR
-
Know that apprehension is likely.
Immediate Threat
The apprehension must relate to imminent use of force.
Future threats generally do not constitute assault.
Examples of Assault
Example 1: Raising a Fist
A person raises his fist and moves toward another person in a threatening manner.
Assault may occur even if no punch is thrown.
Example 2: Pointing a Stick
A person points a stick and threatens immediate violence.
This may amount to assault.
Example 3: Attempting to Strike
A person swings a hand toward another person but misses.
Assault can still exist.
Example 4: Threatening with a Weapon
A person points a weapon in a manner creating immediate fear of attack.
Assault may be established.
Difference Between Assault and Criminal Force
Assault (Section 351)
Apprehension of force.
No physical contact required.
Criminal Force (Section 350)
Actual force used.
Physical force exists.
👉 Assault may occur without touching the victim.
Why IPC Section 351 Was Introduced?
The law recognizes that fear of immediate violence can itself cause harm.
The section helps:
-
Prevent violence before it occurs.
-
Protect personal security.
-
Maintain public order.
-
Criminalize threatening conduct.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
IPC Section 351 itself does not prescribe punishment.
It only defines assault.
Punishment is provided under related sections such as:
-
IPC Section 352
-
IPC Section 353
-
IPC Section 355
-
IPC Section 356
depending on circumstances.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
Not applicable by itself.
Depends on the specific offence charged.
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
Depends on the connected offence.
Compoundable
Depends on the related offence.
Triable By
Depends on the relevant penal provision.
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 351
BNS Equivalent
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues to recognize assault-related concepts and offences.
Status
Concept retained.
The principle remains fundamental to criminal law.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Threatening Punch
A person suddenly raises a fist toward another person during an argument.
Assault may occur.
Example 2: Threatening Movement
A person rushes toward someone with apparent intent to strike.
Assault may be established.
Example 3: Weapon Display
A person brandishes a weapon creating immediate fear.
This may constitute assault.
Example 4: Immediate Threat
A person attempts to slap another but is stopped before contact.
Assault can still exist.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
Rupan Deol Bajaj v. K.P.S. Gill
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
The Court examined conduct involving criminal force and assault-related principles.
Case Name:
State of Punjab v. Major Singh
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Physical acts and intention play a crucial role in force-related offences.
Case Name:
Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Criminal law protects individuals from threats and unlawful coercive conduct.
Legal Insights
When Is This Section Applied?
Section 351 becomes relevant when:
-
Threatening gestures occur.
-
Immediate violence is feared.
-
Courts evaluate assault allegations.
-
Criminal force has not yet occurred.
Common Misuse Scenarios
Confusing Assault with Battery
Physical contact is not required.
Future Threats
A threat of future harm may not amount to assault.
Lack of Immediate Apprehension
No reasonable fear of imminent force exists.
Mere Words
Words alone may not always constitute assault unless accompanied by circumstances creating apprehension.
Defenses Available
No Intention
No intention to create fear existed.
No Reasonable Apprehension
The victim could not reasonably fear immediate force.
Absence of Gesture or Preparation
No threatening conduct occurred.
Mistaken Interpretation
The conduct was misunderstood.