Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 356
Section Title:
Assault or Criminal Force in Attempt to Commit Theft of Property Carried by a Person
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, with substantially similar provisions retained.
Applicability:
IPC Section 356 applies when:
-
A person commits theft or attempts theft;
-
The property is in the possession or carrying of a person;
-
Assault or criminal force is used;
-
The force is used to facilitate theft or snatching.
👉 This section mainly covers snatching-type offences.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 356 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi vyakti kisi dusre person se uska saman chheenne ke liye force ya assault use karta hai, to ye offence hai.
Simple words mein:
"Kisi ke paas se uska samaan force se chheenna crime hai."
Legal Meaning
To establish liability under Section 356:
-
Theft or attempted theft must exist;
-
Property must be in immediate possession of a person;
-
Assault or criminal force must be used;
-
The intention must be to commit theft or snatching.
Essential Ingredients
Property in Possession
The property must be:
-
On the victim, OR
-
In immediate physical control of the victim.
Theft or Attempted Theft
There must be:
-
Dishonest intention to take property.
Use of Force or Assault
The accused must:
-
Use criminal force; OR
-
Create apprehension of force.
Intent to Commit Theft
The purpose must be stealing or snatching.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
IPC Section 356 provides:
-
Imprisonment up to 2 years; OR
-
Fine; OR
-
Both.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
Bailable.
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
Cognizable.
Compoundable
Compoundable in certain cases with court permission.
Triable By
Any Magistrate.
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 356
BNS Equivalent
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita retains provisions related to:
-
Snatching;
-
Theft with force;
-
Use of criminal force during property taking.
Status
Concept retained.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Mobile Snatching
A person forcibly grabs a mobile phone from someone’s hand.
Section 356 applies.
Example 2: Chain Snatching
A person uses force to pull a gold chain from a victim.
Section 356 applies.
Example 3: Bag Snatching
A person pushes a victim and takes their bag.
IPC 356 applies.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Dishonest intention combined with physical force can amount to theft-related offences.
Case Name:
Raman v. State (various High Court interpretations)
Key Takeaway:
Snatching cases are treated seriously when force is used against immediate possession.
Case Name:
K.N. Mehra v. State of Rajasthan
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Dishonest intention is essential in theft-related offences involving force.
Legal Insights
When Is This Section Applied?
Section 356 is applied when:
-
Snatching occurs;
-
Force is used against victim’s possession;
-
Theft or attempt to steal is involved;
-
Physical struggle is present.
Common Misuse Scenarios
No Force Used
Simple theft without force is not Section 356.
No Possession Link
Property not in immediate possession of victim.
Lack of Intent
No dishonest intention to steal.
False Accusation in Disputes
Property disputes wrongly framed as snatching.
Defenses Available
No Use of Force
No assault or criminal force occurred.
No Theft Intention
No dishonest intention present.
Consent
Property was voluntarily handed over.
Mistake or Misunderstanding
No criminal act intended.