Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 368
Section Title:
Wrongfully Concealing or Keeping in Confinement Kidnapped or Abducted Person
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, with substantially similar provisions retained.
Applicability:
IPC Section 368 applies when:
-
A person has been kidnapped or abducted;
-
Another person knowingly conceals, harbours, or confines the victim;
-
The accused knows or has reason to believe that kidnapping or abduction has occurred.
👉 The section punishes those who assist in continuing the illegal detention of victims.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 368 ka simple matlab hai ki agar kisi person ko pata hai ki koi victim kidnap ya abduct hua hai aur phir bhi wo us victim ko chhupa kar rakhta hai ya illegal confinement mein rakhta hai, to wo bhi offence karta hai.
Simple words mein:
"Kidnap hue person ko jaanbujhkar chhupana ya band rakhna crime hai."
Legal Meaning
A person commits an offence under Section 368 when:
-
A kidnapping or abduction has already occurred;
-
The accused knows or believes this fact;
-
The accused conceals or wrongfully confines the victim.
Essential Ingredients
Prior Kidnapping or Abduction
The victim must have been:
-
Kidnapped; OR
-
Abducted.
Knowledge
The accused must:
-
Know; OR
-
Have reason to believe
that the victim was kidnapped or abducted.
Concealment or Confinement
The accused must:
-
Hide the victim; OR
-
Shelter the victim; OR
-
Keep the victim wrongfully confined.
Intentional Conduct
The concealment must be deliberate.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
IPC Section 368 provides:
The offender is punishable in the same manner as if he had kidnapped or abducted the person with the same intention or knowledge as the original offender.
👉 Punishment depends on the nature of the kidnapping offence involved.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
Generally Non-Bailable.
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
Cognizable.
Compoundable
Non-Compoundable.
Triable By
Depends on the underlying kidnapping offence, usually Court of Session.
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 368
BNS Equivalent
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita retains provisions concerning:
-
Harbouring kidnapped persons;
-
Wrongful confinement of abducted persons;
-
Assistance to kidnapping-related crimes.
Status
Concept retained.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Safe House for Kidnappers
A person knowingly allows kidnappers to keep a victim in his house.
Section 368 applies.
Example 2: Concealing a Kidnapped Child
A person hides a kidnapped child despite knowing the child was unlawfully taken.
IPC Section 368 applies.
Example 3: Secret Detention
An abducted person is confined in a warehouse and another individual assists in guarding the victim.
Section 368 applies.
Example 4: Criminal Conspiracy
A gang member keeps a kidnapped victim hidden after the kidnapping is completed.
Section 368 applies.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
State of Maharashtra v. Suresh
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Participation in post-kidnapping concealment can attract serious criminal liability.
Case Name:
Vikram Singh v. Union of India
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Kidnapping-related offences are interpreted strictly to protect victims.
Case Name:
Anil v. Administration of Daman & Diu
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Knowledge and intention are critical factors in determining liability.
Legal Insights
When Is This Section Applied?
Section 368 is commonly invoked when:
-
Victims are hidden after kidnapping;
-
Safe houses are provided;
-
Illegal detention continues;
-
Third parties knowingly assist kidnappers.
Common Misuse Scenarios
No Knowledge
The accused did not know the victim was kidnapped.
Innocent Shelter
A person unknowingly provides accommodation.
No Wrongful Confinement
The victim was not concealed or detained.
False Implication
No evidence links the accused to the kidnapping.
Defenses Available
Lack of Knowledge
The accused did not know about the kidnapping.
No Confinement
No wrongful detention occurred.
No Intentional Assistance
The accused did not knowingly help.
Insufficient Evidence
The prosecution fails to prove involvement.