Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 369 – Kidnapping or Abducting Child Under Ten Years with Intent to Steal from Person

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 17, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 369

Section Title:

Kidnapping or Abducting Child Under Ten Years with Intent to Steal from Its Person

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, with similar child-protection principles retained.

Applicability:

IPC Section 369 applies when:

  • A child under ten years of age is kidnapped or abducted;

  • The accused intends to steal property from the child;

  • The kidnapping or abduction is connected to the intended theft.

👉 The section specifically protects young children from being targeted for theft-related crimes.

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 369 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi person 10 saal se chhote bachche ko kidnap ya abduct karta hai taaki uske paas ki jewellery, money ya kisi property ko chura sake, to ye offence hai.

Simple words mein:

"Chori ke purpose se chhote bachche ko kidnap karna IPC Section 369 ka crime hai."

Legal Meaning

A person commits an offence under Section 369 when:

  • The victim is under ten years old;

  • Kidnapping or abduction takes place;

  • The intention is to steal property from the child's person.

Essential Ingredients

 Victim Must Be Under Ten Years

The age of the child is a crucial requirement.

The prosecution must prove that the child was below ten years of age.

 Kidnapping or Abduction

The child must be:

  • Kidnapped; OR

  • Abducted.

 Intention to Steal

The accused must intend to steal:

  • Jewellery;

  • Money;

  • Valuable articles;

  • Any movable property carried by the child.

 Connection Between Kidnapping and Theft

The kidnapping must be committed for the purpose of theft.

 Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 369 provides:

  • Imprisonment up to 7 years; AND

  • Fine.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

Non-Bailable.

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

Cognizable.

Compoundable

Non-Compoundable.

Triable By

Magistrate of First Class.

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 369

BNS Equivalent

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues provisions relating to:

  • Child kidnapping;

  • Child protection;

  • Theft connected with kidnapping;

  • Exploitation of minors.

Status

Concept retained.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Jewellery Theft

A child wearing gold jewellery is kidnapped so the ornaments can be stolen.

Section 369 applies.

Example 2: Taking Child for Theft

A person abducts a child carrying money with the intention of stealing it.

IPC Section 369 applies.

Example 3: Festival Crowd Incident

A child is separated from guardians and taken away so valuables can be removed.

Section 369 may apply.

Example 4: Organized Theft

Criminals target children specifically because they are carrying expensive ornaments.

Section 369 applies.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name:

State of Haryana v. Raja Ram

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Protection of minors remains a primary objective of kidnapping provisions.

Case Name:

Prithi Chand v. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Kidnapping offences involving vulnerable victims require strict interpretation.

Case Name:

Vikram Singh v. Union of India

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Crimes targeting children are treated with greater seriousness under criminal law.

Legal Insights

When Is This Section Applied?

Section 369 is applied when:

  • The victim is under ten years old;

  • Kidnapping or abduction occurs;

  • Theft is the objective;

  • Children are specifically targeted for valuables.


Common Misuse Scenarios

No Theft Intention

Kidnapping occurred but not for theft purposes.

Age Not Established

The prosecution cannot prove the child was under ten.

No Kidnapping

The child was not unlawfully removed.

False Allegations

Facts may support another offence rather than Section 369.


Defenses Available

No Intent to Steal

The required intention is absent.

Victim Not Under Ten

Age requirement is not satisfied.

No Kidnapping or Abduction

Essential ingredient not established.

Insufficient Evidence

The prosecution fails to prove motive or conduct.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 369 punishes kidnapping or abducting a child under ten years for the purpose of theft.

Up to 7 years imprisonment and fine.

No, it is non-bailable.

Yes.

The child must be under ten years old.

The intention to steal is sufficient in many cases.

Yes, if kidnapping is linked to stealing jewellery from the child.

Similar child-protection provisions continue under BNS.

No, the intention to steal from the child must also exist.

It protects young children from being targeted for theft and exploitation.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation