Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 402
Section Title:
Assembling for Purpose of Committing Dacoity
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 with similar preventive provisions related to organized crime and group offences.
Applicability:
IPC Section 402 applies when:
-
A group of persons assembles;
-
The assembly is for committing dacoity;
-
The accused is part of the assembly;
-
There is clear intent to commit robbery with five or more persons.
👉 This section is a preventive criminal law provision.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 402 ka simple matlab hai ki agar log ikattha hote hain aur unka maksad dacoity (5 ya usse zyada logon ki robbery) karna hota hai, to woh offence hota hai.
Simple words mein:
"Dacoity karne ke irade se ikattha hona hi IPC 402 ka offence hai."
Legal Meaning
Section 402 applies when:
-
A group physically assembles;
-
The purpose is committing dacoity;
-
Criminal intent is shared;
-
The offence is prevented before execution.
Essential Ingredients
Assembly of Persons
There must be a gathering of individuals.
Common Objective of Dacoity
The sole or primary purpose must be:
-
Committing dacoity.
Knowledge of Purpose
Each accused must:
-
Know the object of assembly;
-
Voluntarily participate.
Criminal Intention
There must be a shared intention to commit a violent robbery.
Why IPC Section 402 Is Important
This section is important because it:
-
Prevents dacoity before execution;
-
Enables early police intervention;
-
Dismantles criminal groups at planning stage;
-
Protects public safety and order.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
IPC Section 402 provides:
-
Rigorous imprisonment up to 7 years; AND
-
Fine.
👉 Punishment reflects seriousness of organized criminal intent.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
❌ Non-Bailable
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
✔ Cognizable
Compoundable
❌ Non-Compoundable
Triable By
Court of Session
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 402
BNS Equivalent
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita retains provisions relating to:
-
Organized criminal assemblies;
-
Dacoity-related preparatory offences;
-
Group-based violent crime prevention.
Status
Concept retained under BNS.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Armed Gang Meeting
Six persons gather with weapons planning a robbery on a highway.
Section 402 applies.
Example 2: Planning House Dacoity
A group assembles secretly to plan robbery of a house.
IPC 402 applies.
Example 3: Police Raid
Police arrest individuals gathered to execute a planned dacoity.
Section 402 applies even before crime occurs.
Example 4: Organized Criminal Planning
A gang assembles repeatedly to coordinate multiple dacoities.
Section 402 applies.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
Ram Sharan v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Assembly with clear criminal intent is sufficient for liability under preventive provisions.
Case Name:
Shyam Behari v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Common intention and coordinated preparation are essential in dacoity-related offences.
Case Name:
State of Maharashtra v. Mohd. Yakub
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Preventive criminal liability is justified when intent and acts clearly indicate planned crime.
Legal Insights
When Is Section 402 Applied?
Section 402 is applied when:
-
Dacoity is the objective;
-
Group assembles physically;
-
Police intervene before offence;
-
Criminal planning is established.
Difference Between Sections 401 and 402
| Section | Nature |
|---|---|
| IPC 401 | Assembly for committing dacoity (general) |
| IPC 402 | Assembly specifically for committing dacoity (focused preventive offence) |
👉 Both deal with prevention but cover slightly different legal framing of assembly.
Common Misuse Scenarios
Innocent Gathering
Normal gathering without intent is not covered.
Lack of Proof of Intent
Intent to commit dacoity must be established.
Mere Suspicion
Suspicion alone is insufficient.
Absence of Coordination
Independent presence without common purpose is not enough.
Defenses Available
No Criminal Intent
Assembly was not for dacoity.
Lack of Knowledge
Accused was unaware of purpose.
Mere Presence
Accused was present but not part of plan.
False Implication
Wrongly linked to group.