Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 426 – Punishment for Mischief

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 19, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 426

Section Title:

Punishment for Mischief

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Replaced under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 with corresponding provisions relating to damage or destruction of property.

Applicability:

IPC Section 426 applies when:

  • The offence of mischief under Section 425 is committed;

  • Property is damaged, destroyed, altered, or made less useful;

  • Wrongful loss or damage is caused intentionally or knowingly;

  • No aggravated form of mischief applies.

👉 Section 426 is the general punishment provision for mischief.

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 426 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi vyakti kisi ki property ko jaanbujhkar nuksan pahunchata hai aur mischief karta hai, to usko punishment di ja sakti hai.

Simple words mein:

"Property ko jaanbujhkar nuksan pahunchane par IPC 426 ke under saza milti hai."

Legal Meaning

Section 426 applies when:

  • Mischief under Section 425 is established;

  • Damage to property occurs;

  • There is intention or knowledge of causing loss;

  • No special aggravated section is attracted.

Essential Ingredients

 Mischief Must Be Proved

All ingredients of Section 425 must exist.

 Property Damage

There must be:

  • Destruction;

  • Damage;

  • Alteration;

  • Reduction in value or utility.

 Wrongful Loss

The act must cause or likely cause loss.

 Intention or Knowledge

The accused must intentionally or knowingly cause damage.

Why IPC Section 426 Is Important

This section:

  • Protects private property;

  • Protects public property;

  • Discourages vandalism;

  • Maintains social order;

  • Provides punishment for ordinary property damage.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 426 provides:

  • Imprisonment up to 3 months; OR

  • Fine; OR

  • Both.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

✔ Bailable

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

❌ Non-Cognizable

Compoundable

✔ Compoundable

Triable By

Any Magistrate

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 426

BNS Equivalent

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita retains provisions concerning:

  • Mischief;

  • Property damage;

  • Destruction of movable and immovable property.

Status

Concept retained under BNS.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Damaging a Vehicle

A person intentionally breaks another person's vehicle mirror.

Section 426 applies.

Example 2: Breaking Furniture

A person destroys furniture belonging to another.

IPC 426 applies.

Example 3: Vandalizing Property

A person damages walls, windows, or equipment.

Section 426 applies.

Example 4: Damaging Agricultural Property

A person intentionally harms irrigation equipment or crops.

Section 426 may apply.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name:

State of Karnataka v. K. Krishnan

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Intentional damage to property deserves legal sanction to preserve public order.

Case Name:

Mohan Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Court:

High Court

Key Takeaway:

Mischief requires intention or knowledge of likely damage.

Case Name:

Public Property Damage Cases

Court:

Various Indian Courts

Key Takeaway:

Wrongful damage to property satisfies the ingredients of mischief.

Legal Insights

When Is Section 426 Applied?

Section 426 is invoked when:

  • Ordinary mischief is committed;

  • Property is intentionally damaged;

  • Wrongful loss results;

  • No aggravated mischief provision applies.

Difference Between Sections 425 and 426

Section Nature
425 Definition of mischief
426 Punishment for mischief

Common Misuse Scenarios

 Accidental Damage

No criminal intention exists.

Civil Property Disputes

Ownership disputes may be wrongly criminalized.

Lack of Evidence

Actual damage cannot be proven.

No Intention

Damage occurred unintentionally.

Defenses Available

No Intention

The act was accidental.

No Knowledge

The accused did not foresee damage.

No Actual Damage

No reduction in value or utility occurred.

Bona Fide Claim

The accused acted under a genuine claim of right.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 426 provides punishment for mischief.

Up to 3 months imprisonment, fine, or both.

Yes.

No, generally non-cognizable.

Intentional property damage causing wrongful loss.

Not necessarily; reduced value or utility may suffice.

Generally no.

Similar property-damage provisions continue under BNS.

Yes, generally compoundable.

It protects property from intentional damage and vandalism.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation