Section Overview
Section Number:
IPC Section 480
Section Title:
Using a Counterfeit Property Mark
Act:
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
Status:
Substantially retained under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 within provisions dealing with trade fraud, counterfeit marking, and property identification offences.
Applicability:
IPC Section 480 applies when a person:
-
Uses a counterfeit property mark on goods or property;
-
Knows that the mark is counterfeit;
-
Intends to deceive others regarding ownership or origin;
-
Causes or attempts to cause wrongful gain or loss through such use.
👉 The focus is on use, not just creation of fake marks.
Section Explanation
Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)
IPC Section 480 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi vyakti kisi product ya property par fake property mark lagata hai ya use karta hai aur janta hai ki woh mark jhootha hai, to woh crime karta hai.
Simple words mein:
"Fake property mark ko use karna IPC 480 hai."
Legal Meaning
Section 480 punishes:
-
Use of counterfeit property marks;
-
Intentional misrepresentation of ownership or origin;
-
Fraudulent branding or labeling of goods;
-
Acts done knowingly to deceive.
Essential Ingredients
Counterfeit Property Mark
There must be a fake mark representing:
-
Ownership; OR
-
Origin; OR
-
Identity of goods.
Use of the Mark
The accused must actively:
-
Apply;
-
Display;
-
Sell goods with; OR
-
Represent goods using counterfeit mark.
Knowledge
The accused must know:
-
The mark is counterfeit; AND
-
It is being used fraudulently.
Fraudulent Intention
The purpose must be to:
-
Deceive buyers or authorities;
-
Gain wrongful benefit;
-
Misrepresent ownership or origin.
Why IPC Section 480 Is Important
This section:
-
Protects consumers from fraud;
-
Prevents misuse of ownership marks;
-
Ensures fair trade practices;
-
Protects brand and ownership identity;
-
Maintains trust in commercial transactions.
Difference Between Sections 479 and 480
| IPC 479 | IPC 480 |
|---|---|
| Deals with fraudulent marking | Deals with using counterfeit mark |
| Focus on creation/marking | Focus on use of fake marks |
| Broader marking offences | Specific usage offence |
👉 Section 480 is the “usage stage” offence.
Common Forms of Offence
Fake Branded Goods
Selling goods using fake company property marks.
Misleading Ownership Labels
Using someone else’s property mark to sell goods.
Counterfeit Packaging Use
Using fake labels to increase product value.
Commercial Fraud
Using counterfeit marks to mislead consumers in trade.
Punishment & Legal Classification
Punishment
IPC Section 480 provides:
-
Imprisonment up to 3 years; OR
-
Fine; OR
-
Both.
Bailable / Non-Bailable
✔ Generally Bailable
Cognizable / Non-Cognizable
❌ Generally Non-Cognizable
Compoundable
✔ Compoundable (in certain cases with court permission)
Triable By
Magistrate of First Class
IPC ↔ BNS Mapping
IPC Section
IPC Section 480
BNS Equivalent
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita includes corresponding provisions dealing with:
-
Use of counterfeit property marks;
-
Trade mark misuse;
-
Commercial fraud and deception in goods.
Status
Concept retained and updated for modern commercial enforcement.
Real-Life Examples
Example 1: Fake Branding Use
A person sells goods using fake property marks of a well-known company.
Section 480 applies.
Example 2: Misleading Ownership Label
Goods are marked with another person’s property mark to deceive buyers.
IPC Section 480 is attracted.
Example 3: Counterfeit Product Packaging
Fake property marks are used on packaging to make goods appear original.
Section 480 applies.
Example 4: Market Deception
A trader knowingly uses counterfeit marks to increase resale value.
Offence under IPC 480 is made out.
Landmark Judgments
Case Name:
Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Misleading marks can create consumer confusion and must be strictly regulated.
Case Name:
Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Protection of trade identity is essential for fair commercial practices.
Case Name:
Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah
Court:
Supreme Court of India
Key Takeaway:
Misrepresentation in trade affects goodwill and consumer trust.
Legal Insights
When Is Section 480 Applied?
Section 480 is applied when:
-
Counterfeit property marks are used on goods;
-
Consumers are deceived;
-
Ownership or origin is misrepresented;
-
Fraudulent trade practices occur.
Common Misuse Scenarios
Civil Trademark Disputes
Business disputes mistaken for criminal offences.
Lack of Intent
No intention to deceive consumers.
Clerical Labeling Errors
Mistaken or accidental marking.
Unregistered Trade Confusion
Brand confusion without fraud.
Defenses Available
No Fraudulent Intent
No intention to mislead.
Genuine Mark
Mark is authentic or legally permitted.
Lack of Knowledge
Accused unaware of counterfeit nature.
No Deception Possibility
No likelihood of consumer confusion.