Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 482 – Using False Trade Mark or Property Mark

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 20, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 482

Section Title:

Using a False Trade Mark or Property Mark

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Retained in substance under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 within provisions relating to counterfeiting, trade fraud, and misuse of identification marks.

Applicability:

IPC Section 482 applies when a person:

  • Uses a false trade mark or property mark on goods;

  • Knows the mark is false or counterfeit;

  • Intends to deceive consumers, buyers, or authorities;

  • Causes or attempts to cause wrongful gain or loss.

👉 This section focuses on actual use of false marks, not just making or possessing them.

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 482 ka simple matlab hai ki agar koi vyakti kisi product ya property par fake trade mark ya property mark laga kar use karta hai aur janta hai ki woh fake hai, to woh crime karta hai.

Simple words mein:

"Fake brand ya ownership mark ko use karna IPC 482 hai."

Legal Meaning

Section 482 punishes:

  • Use of counterfeit trade marks;

  • Use of false property marks;

  • Misrepresentation of goods or ownership;

  • Fraudulent branding or labeling in trade.

The key element is use with knowledge and intent.

Essential Ingredients

False Trade Mark or Property Mark

There must be:

  • A counterfeit trade mark; OR

  • A false property mark.

Use of the Mark

The accused must:

  • Apply the mark; OR

  • Display it on goods; OR

  • Sell or distribute goods with such mark.

Knowledge of Falsity

The accused must know:

  • The mark is fake; AND

  • It is being used fraudulently.

Fraudulent Intent

The purpose must be to:

  • Deceive consumers;

  • Mislead buyers about origin/ownership;

  • Gain wrongful benefit.

Why IPC Section 482 Is Important

This section:

  • Protects consumers from fraud;

  • Ensures authenticity in trade;

  • Prevents counterfeit branding misuse;

  • Maintains trust in commercial markets;

  • Safeguards intellectual and property identity.

Difference Between Sections 481 and 482

Section Focus
481 Making/marking goods with false marks
482 Using false marks on goods

👉 Section 482 is the execution stage of fraud.

Common Forms of Offence

Fake Branding in Market

Using fake company logos on products.

Misleading Labels

Using false property or origin marks.

Counterfeit Product Sale

Selling goods with fake identity marks.

 Online Fraud

Selling counterfeit goods using fake branding.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 482 provides:

  • Imprisonment up to 3 years; OR

  • Fine; OR

  • Both.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

✔ Generally Bailable

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

❌ Generally Non-Cognizable

Compoundable

✔ Compoundable (with court permission in certain cases)

Triable By

Magistrate of First Class

 IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 482

BNS Equivalent

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita includes corresponding provisions dealing with:

  • Use of counterfeit trade marks;

  • Use of false property marks;

  • Commercial fraud and deceptive labeling.

Status

Concept retained and adapted for modern trade and digital commerce.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Fake Branded Goods

A seller uses fake luxury brand logos on clothing.

Section 482 applies.

Example 2: Misleading Property Label

Goods are sold using another company’s property mark.

IPC Section 482 is attracted.

Example 3: Counterfeit Packaging Use

Fake branding is used on product packaging to mislead buyers.

Section 482 applies.

Example 4: E-commerce Fraud

Online seller uses fake trade marks to sell counterfeit products.

Offence under IPC 482 is made out.

Landmark Judgments

Case Name:

Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd.

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Use of misleading marks in trade causes consumer confusion and must be strictly regulated.

Case Name:

Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Trade identity protection is essential to prevent deception.

Case Name:

Laxmikant V. Patel v. Chetanbhai Shah

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

Misuse of branding harms goodwill and is legally actionable.

Legal Insights

When Is Section 482 Applied?

Section 482 is applied when:

  • False marks are used on goods;

  • Consumers are misled;

  • Ownership or origin is misrepresented;

  • Fraudulent commercial activity occurs.

Common Misuse Scenarios

Honest Mistake

No intention to deceive.

Civil Trademark Dispute

Business dispute mistaken as criminal case.

 Lack of Knowledge

Accused unaware of counterfeit mark.

Accidental Branding Similarity

No fraudulent intent present.

Defenses Available

No Fraudulent Intent

No intention to deceive.

Genuine Mark Usage

Mark is authentic or legally valid.

Lack of Knowledge

Accused unaware of falsity.

No Deception Likely

No reasonable possibility of confusion.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 482 punishes using false trade or property marks on goods.

Up to 3 years imprisonment or fine or both.

Yes, generally bailable.

Generally non-cognizable.

481 is marking false goods; 482 is using false marks.

Yes, fraudulent intent is essential.

Similar provisions exist under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

It is a moderate-level economic offence.

Yes, including e-commerce fraud cases.

It protects consumers and ensures fairness in trade.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation