Emergency Bail?  Call  +91-9773727566  —  Available 24/7
ipc

IPC Section 92 – Act Done in Good Faith for Benefit of a Person Without Consent

Adv. Kuldeep Kumar June 08, 2026 5 min read

Section Overview

Section Number:

IPC Section 92

Section Title:

Act Done in Good Faith for Benefit of a Person Without Consent

Act:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Status:

Replaced under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023

Applicability:

IPC Section 92 applies where a person performs an act in good faith for the benefit of another person without obtaining consent because:

  • It is impossible to obtain consent.

  • The person is incapable of giving consent.

  • There is no guardian or lawful authority available to provide consent.

The provision commonly applies in emergency situations where immediate action is necessary to protect life, health, or safety.

Original Law Text

"Nothing is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause to a person for whose benefit it is done in good faith, even without that person's consent, if the circumstances are such that it is impossible for that person to signify consent, or if that person is incapable of giving consent, and has no guardian or other person in lawful charge from whom it is possible to obtain consent in time for the thing to be done with benefit."

The section also contains specific limitations and exceptions.

Section Explanation

Simple Explanation (Plain English/Hinglish)

IPC Section 92 ka simple matlab hai ki agar kisi vyakti ki bhalai ke liye koi kaam good faith mein kiya jata hai aur us waqt uski consent lena possible nahi hai, to aisa act offence nahi mana jayega.

For example:

Agar koi person accident mein unconscious ho jaye aur doctor uski jaan bachane ke liye emergency surgery kare, to doctor ne patient ki permission nahi li hoti.

Lekin kyunki surgery patient ke benefit ke liye aur good faith mein ki gayi hai, doctor criminally liable nahi hoga.

Simple words mein:

"Jab consent lena possible na ho aur kisi ki bhalai ke liye honestly action liya jaye, to law protection deta hai."

Legal Definition (Original Law Text)

Section 92 protects acts done in good faith for a person's benefit when obtaining consent is impossible or impractical because of the circumstances.

Practical Interpretation

Section 92 recognizes that emergencies do not always allow time for obtaining consent.

The law therefore protects individuals who act honestly and reasonably to save life or prevent serious harm.

The provision is especially relevant in:

  • Emergency medical treatment

  • Rescue operations

  • Disaster response

  • Life-saving interventions

  • Urgent protective actions

However, the protection applies only when:

  • The act is done in good faith.

  • The purpose is to benefit the affected person.

  • Consent cannot reasonably be obtained.

The section does not permit reckless or malicious conduct.

Essential Ingredients of Section 92

For protection under Section 92, the following conditions must exist:

Good Faith

The person must act honestly and with due care.

Benefit of the Person

The action must genuinely aim to help the person affected.

Impossibility of Consent

Obtaining consent must be impossible or impractical.

Emergency Circumstances

Immediate action must be necessary.

No Malicious Intent

The act must not be motivated by personal gain or ill will.

Limitations Under Section 92

The protection is not unlimited.

The section does not justify:

  • Intentional killing.

  • Acts done knowing that death is likely except where prevention of greater harm requires intervention.

  • Actions motivated by wrongful objectives.

  • Conduct performed without genuine concern for the person's welfare.

Why IPC Section 92 Was Introduced?

The legislature recognized that emergencies often require immediate decisions.

Without Section 92:

  • Doctors could hesitate to provide urgent treatment.

  • Rescue workers could fear prosecution.

  • Life-saving actions might be delayed.

  • Innocent helpers could face criminal liability.

The provision encourages responsible intervention when consent cannot be obtained.

Punishment & Legal Classification

Punishment

IPC Section 92 does not prescribe punishment.

It is a general exception that provides protection from criminal liability.

Bailable / Non-Bailable

Not applicable.

No offence is created under Section 92.

Cognizable / Non-Cognizable

Not applicable.

Compoundable

Not applicable.

Triable By

Not applicable.

Section 92 itself is not an offence.

IPC ↔ BNS Mapping

IPC Section

IPC Section 92

BNS Equivalent

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 continues to recognize general exceptions protecting good-faith acts performed for the benefit of others in emergency situations.

Status

IPC repealed and replaced by BNS.

However, the underlying legal principle continues in modern criminal law.

Real-Life Examples

Example 1: Emergency Surgery

A patient is brought unconscious to a hospital after a severe road accident.

Doctors immediately perform surgery to save the patient's life.

Even though consent was not obtained, the doctors are protected under Section 92 because the procedure was performed in good faith for the patient's benefit.

Example 2: Rescue During Flood

A rescue worker forcibly moves an unconscious individual from a flooded building.

The person suffers minor injuries during the rescue.

The rescuer is protected because the action was taken in good faith to save life.

Example 3: Emergency Medical Treatment of a Child

A child without accompanying guardians requires urgent treatment.

The doctor performs necessary medical procedures without waiting for parental consent.

The act falls within the protection of Section 92.

Landmark Judgments

Although Section 92 is not frequently litigated independently, courts have discussed the principles of good faith and necessity in various decisions.

Case Name:

Parmanand Katara v. Union of India

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The Court emphasized that preservation of human life is of paramount importance and that doctors have a duty to provide immediate medical assistance in emergencies.

Case Name:

Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The Court discussed standards of medical negligence and highlighted the importance of good faith medical decision-making.

Case Name:

R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay

Court:

Supreme Court of India

Key Takeaway:

The Court reiterated the importance of interpreting statutory provisions according to legislative intent and purpose.

Legal Insights

When Is This Section Applied?

Section 92 is commonly applied in situations involving:

  • Emergency medical care.

  • Unconscious patients.

  • Accident victims.

  • Disaster rescue operations.

  • Urgent life-saving measures.

  • Protection of children and vulnerable persons.


Common Misuse Scenarios

 Claiming Good Faith Without Evidence

A person may falsely claim that harmful conduct was intended for another's benefit.

Courts examine surrounding circumstances carefully.

Ignoring Availability of Consent

If consent could reasonably have been obtained, Section 92 may not apply.

Using the Section to Justify Negligence

The provision protects good-faith acts, not careless or reckless conduct.

Acting for Personal Benefit

If the act primarily benefits the actor rather than the affected person, protection may be denied.


Defenses Available

When Section 92 is invoked, the accused may rely on:

Good Faith

Showing honest intention and due care.

Emergency Circumstances

Demonstrating urgent necessity.

Impossibility of Consent

Proving that consent could not be obtained in time.

Benefit of the Person

Establishing that the act aimed to help the affected individual.

Absence of Criminal Intent

Showing lack of malicious motives.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Please consult a qualified advocate for your specific legal matter.
Adv. Kuldeep Kumar
Verified Advocate
Bar Council Reg: BR/196/2015

Frequently Asked Questions

IPC Section 92 protects acts done in good faith for a person's benefit when consent cannot be obtained.

No. It is a general exception that provides legal protection.

Not applicable because the section itself creates no offence.

There is no punishment because Section 92 is a defense provision.

It applies when consent cannot be obtained and action is necessary for a person's benefit.

Yes. Emergency medical treatment is one of the most common situations where Section 92 applies.

Yes. Good faith is an essential requirement.

Yes. Rescue actions performed honestly for another person's benefit may be protected.

No. The section protects good-faith actions, not negligence or recklessness.

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita continues to recognize protections for good-faith acts performed for the benefit of others in emergency situations.
Share:
24/7 Emergency Bail
For urgent bail matters, call now
+91-9773727566

Need Legal Assistance?

Our team of verified advocates is here to help you. Get a free consultation today.

Book Free Consultation